<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Jobs hates profit!</title>
	<link>http://www.thegeekery.biz/2007/09/05/steve-jobs-hates-profit/</link>
	<description>We're still thinking of a tag line ok?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: iPhone-Blog.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekery.biz/2007/09/05/steve-jobs-hates-profit/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone-Blog.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thegeekery.biz/2007/09/05/steve-jobs-hates-profit/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Nice  comment.
 I am sure you'll like my diary..
 Sayonara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice  comment.<br />
 I am sure you&#8217;ll like my diary..<br />
 Sayonara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekery.biz/2007/09/05/steve-jobs-hates-profit/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thegeekery.biz/2007/09/05/steve-jobs-hates-profit/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I personally think the new colors are disgusting for the nanos and shuffles, the nano is’nt nano anymore and its short and fat (its like a squished down version of an iPod video) the iPod classic isn’t classic because there is no white and the iPod touch is like a cheap version of the iPhone.

If you look at the back of the iPod touch, there is a blakc rectangle in the corner for no reason. It’s to replace the camera that they never put in it (that should be there, it looks cheap)

The one bonus about the iPod touch is the wi-fi. There is wi-fi hotspots everywhere where I live and I can get free internet on the go. Why would I pay At&#38;T to use the exact same type of internet when I can use on a device that looks the same and is free?

Apple really messed up there. They should have made the new nano iPod Nano with video and kept the old size and shape, I’m pretty sure EVERYONE liked the old nanos. And the white (actually classic iPod) not silver. ew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think the new colors are disgusting for the nanos and shuffles, the nano is’nt nano anymore and its short and fat (its like a squished down version of an iPod video) the iPod classic isn’t classic because there is no white and the iPod touch is like a cheap version of the iPhone.</p>
<p>If you look at the back of the iPod touch, there is a blakc rectangle in the corner for no reason. It’s to replace the camera that they never put in it (that should be there, it looks cheap)</p>
<p>The one bonus about the iPod touch is the wi-fi. There is wi-fi hotspots everywhere where I live and I can get free internet on the go. Why would I pay At&amp;T to use the exact same type of internet when I can use on a device that looks the same and is free?</p>
<p>Apple really messed up there. They should have made the new nano iPod Nano with video and kept the old size and shape, I’m pretty sure EVERYONE liked the old nanos. And the white (actually classic iPod) not silver. ew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
